Funding Source: National Science Foundation (NSF)
Our research
focuses on the dynamics of polymer blend films and polymer blend films
containing nanoparticles. Controlling
the properties in these systems is greatly complicated by the simultaneous
occurrence of phase separation and wetting, especially when the system contains
mobile nanoparticles. Our goal is to
provide the insights of basic
science on the phase development of the thin films systems. Our studies can provide the template to tailor the desired morphologies, so that the films can be used in tissue scaffolds or polymeric light emitting devices (LEDs).
Polymer blend thin
films (~500nm) of poly(methylmethacrylate) (PMMA) and poly(styrene-ran-acrylonitrile)
(SAN) (φPMMA=0.5) undergo three distinctive stages of
morphology development: early, intermediate and late stages [1]. The early stage (ES) is dominated by hydrodynamic-flow-driven wetting of
PMMA to the free surface and substrate has through a 3D
bicontinuous morphology (e.g.,
tubes) of PMMA:SAN interfaces produced by spinodal
decomposition, which provides a pathway for the hydrodynamic-flow-driven
wetting of PMMA to the free surface and substrate. During the
intermediate stage (IS),
discrete, PMMA-rich (denoted PMMA)
domains in span the SAN-rich (denoted SAN) matrix in the mid-layer
(actually
tubes bridging two wetting layers of and grow as 2D disks. PMMA)[13], until
theThe
late state begins when long-range fluctuations parallel to the wetting layer/mid-layer interface
rupture the film. The
three-staged development was found for films thicker than ~70nm for critical
blends. Effects of lateral confinement
and surface patterning were also studied [2].
Using surface force microscopy (SFM) to characterize the IS of the non-wetting phase (SAN-rich) structure, we found six distinct morphological mechanisms as film thickness and composition was varied [3]. These mechanisms are distinguished by (A) PMMA domain coarsening, (B) a mixed mechanism of (A) and (B), (C) lateral material flow of a nearly-bicontinuous in-plane morphology, (D) dewetting of the SAN mid-layer from wetting layers, (E) a metastable trilayer structure, and (F) SAN droplets in a PMMA matrix. The regimes are mapped in Figure 1. Especially, regimes A and C exhibited quasi-2D phase separation with discrete and bicontinuous morphological growth, respectively. In regime A (discrete), we found a universal scaling behavior with time and thickness, which are consistent with a coalescent model. On the other hand, universal scaling failed in regime C (bicontinuous), suggesting that the hydrodynamic pumping mechanism is suppressed by confinement. Details are described in ref [4].
Fig 1. Intermediate Stage Phase
Map. (White: SAN, black: PMMA (etched))
[3]
We also studied the impact of mobile nanoparticles on the phase separation dynamics using hydrophobized silica nanoparticles (~22nm). Particle motion and distributions are monitored with transmission electron microscopy (TEM), Rutherford backscattering (RBS), and SFM. In TEM picture from an as-cast film (Fig 2a), lateral homogeneous dispersion of nanoparticles (black) is confirmed. Upon annealing, PMMA-rich phase (white) forms domains scattered in continuous SAN-rich phase (gray) in the IS (Fig 2b). Interestingly, nanoparticles seem to partition into PMMA-rich phase, suggesting a preferential wetting. RBS studies reveal that the vertical distributions of nanoparticles with time are consistent with PMMA wetting layer build-up and back-flows (see [1], PRE (2000)). SFM shows local surface modulus change at the partcile-rich domains and time-dependent growth dynamics. In short, TEM, RBS, and SFM data are self-consistent to show that the particles partition into PMMA-rich phase. In addition, we found that the addition of nanoparticles slows down the phase separation dynamics drastically. Details are discussed in ref [5].
Fig 2. (a-b) TEM images from 120nm thick PMMA:SAN (50:50) films containing 5wt% silica nanoparticles (black dots, ~22nm). Particles are homogeneously dispersed after spin coating (a), then partition into PMMA-rich phase (white) rather than SAN-rich phase (gray) upon annealing. Schematic cartoon of the morphology is drawn in (c). Further evidences of partitioning of particles are observed with RBS and SFM. [5]
[1] H. Wang and
R. J. Composto, “Understanding Morphology Evolution and Roughening in Phase
Separating Thin Film Polymer Blends”, Europhys. Lett., 50, 622
(2000); see also: J. Chem. Phys., 113, 10386 (2000); Phys.
Rev. E, 61, 1659 (2000); Langmuir, 17, 2857 (2001); Macromolecules,
35, 2799 (2002); Interf. Sci., 11, 237 (2003).
[2] Bi-min Zhang
Newby and R. J. Composto, “Influence of Lateral Confinement on Phaer Separation
in Thin Film Polymer Blends”, Macromolecules, 33, 3274 (2000);
“Phase Morphology Map of Polymer Blend Thin Films Confined to Narrow Strips”, Phys.
Rev. Lett., 87, 098302 (2001); see also: Polymer, 42,
9155 (2001).
[3] Hyun-joong
Chung, Howard Wang, and Russell J. Composto, “Interface Modulated Pattern
Formations in Thin Film Polymer Blends”, Macromolecules, to be submitted.
[4] Hyun-joong
Chung and R. J. Composto, “Breakdown of Dynamic Scaling in Thin Film Binary
Liquids Undergoing Phase Separation”, Phys. Rev. Lett., 92,
185704 (2004).
[5] Hyun-joong
Chung, Andreas Taubert, Ranjan D. Deshmukh, and Russell J. Composto, “Mobile
Nanoparticles and Their Effect on Phase Separation Dynamics in Polymer Blend
Film”, Europhys. Lett., in press, (2004).